Posts Tagged ‘caffeine’

Coffee can be good for you – according to new studies

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

A recent story in the Wall Street Journal highlights some significant benefits to drinking coffee. Also a look at the new “anti-energy” drinks like Drank, containing calming herbs like chamomile, melatonin, valerian root and rose hip. Dr Inaba comments include the every-few-decades cycling of the kind of drugs that are popular.

Listen to podcast

Transcript (edited):

CNS:    Hi and welcome once again to the CNS Addiction Podcast. I’m Howard LaMere, here with Dr Darryl Inaba. One of the topics we focused on recently was the negative aspects of coffee and caffeine, and here is an article in the (December 31, 2009) Wall Street Journal about the positive aspects of coffee.

DARRYL: Quite a surprising story, an amazing one published by the WSJ which is fairly investigative and conservative in their reporting, and they published this just before Christmas, when people are gearing up for the Holidays  – the after-dinner coffees, and coffees during the day, so it was good timing. Contrary to many older studies which outline the negative aspects, the hazards and the addictive properties of coffee, this study showed positive results, amazing results from the practice of drinking coffee. Six cups of standard coffee lowered the risk of prostate cancer, 5 cups lowered the risk of Alzheimer’s by 65% in a Finnish study … that alone is enough to inspire me to go back to drinking coffee after I have been clean from coffee for some 30 something years.  I haven’t touched a drop of coffee because when I start I can’t seem to stop, I’ll go way above 6 cups, I’ll go up to 20 cups a day. But if 5 cups per day can lower the risk of Alzheimer’s disease by 65% that is saying something. It also cuts the possibility of stroke in women, and reduced the risk of developing Type II diabetes, which impacts a huge number of people in the United States. Close to 80 million people are pre-diabetic or diabetic type IIs so if 4 cups a day can cut that by 25 – 35 %, that’s a huge health benefit.

The study also claims coffee cuts the risk of gallstones, and lowers the risk of committing suicide. That surprised me because one of the problems with drinking coffee in excess is the crash.  According to this study, people that drink at least 2 cups of coffee a day cut the risk of suicide by 60%.  All these positive things are quite amazing. The older studies found increased hypertension – high blood pressure, cardiac or heart irritability with a propensity to develop irregular heart beat, increased stroke risk, and risk of miscarriage. A recent study says that pregnant women who drink 3 cups a day increase the risk of miscarriage. A lot of major hazards, GI irritability, maybe even some cancers of the stomach are on the opposite side of these health benefits. So the jury is still out about if it’s positively good for you, or positively bad for you, but it seems like there’s a lot of good news about coffee drinking.

CNS:    How are these studies conducted, it’s hard to do a regular double-blind test.

DARRYL: This is purely anecdotal. These are just reports – asking questions of people, and that’s why these studies are controversial. Researchers will ask people how many cups of coffee they drink a day, over how long a period of time, because they want to gage results on a longitudinal basis, to see what risks are connected. A lot of people aren’t going to remember how many cups of coffee they drank over the last ten years. And people are either stimulus-augmenters, or stimulus-reducers, I find very few people who are stimulus-normal.  And that means, some people are going to exaggerate – think they drank a higher number, and some will be stimulus-reducers; thinking they drink a lesser number per day.

CNS:    So what do make of the effect you mentioned of the stimulant effect on blood pressure – high blood pressure and heart disease – it sounds like its very contradictory. The article also mentions other substances beside caffeine in coffee, which might have a counteracting effect.

DARRYL: Caffeine is linked to increases in ergotamine, which is implicated in a number of health issues, so there is a concern, that’s these good studies are going to be outweighed by more of the untoward effects of coffee. I’ve always felt that caffeine addiction – drinking more than 5 cups a day or more than 500 mg, contributed to a number of deaths associated with GI, cardiac, blood pressure problems, and stroke in the US. It comes down to – what are you at more risk for, heart disease, diabetes or Alzheimer’s, so what’s better for you to take?

CNS:    That leads to wanting more information on a person’s individual biology, and we’re getting closer to that with different ways of assessing the DNA, we’re able to access much more than the family history. Where do you see that leading, in terms of how people make the kind of decisions you are talking about.

DARRYL:  That’s interesting because in medicine now, in pharmacy schools across the nation, in medical schools, they’re talking about genomics and genomic therapy. Today there is an easier method of looking at peoples genes, getting peoples vulnerabilities.  Gene clips take a snapshot of somebody’s gene’s vulnerabilities, to determine what type of medication is best for somebody with hypertension, with diabetes, with asthma. This matches the medication with the person’s vulnerability. If this continues to develop it will explodes into an era of medicine where everyone is treated not only by their diagnosis and symptom otology, but also by matching the treatment to their actual genetic code – what will be healthiest for them, and cause the least side effects. This could extend to nutrition, and maybe even determine whether you should drink coffee and tea or not.

CNS:  An interesting reverse side of that – Salon magazine calls 2010 the year of the “anti-energy drink.” New products have been introduced that are like the opposite of Red Bull … what do you know about that?

DARRYL:  It’s a historical thing; I see it purely in the form of history and the addiction cycle. Dr. Musto’s book (The American Disease: Origins of Narcotic Control) talks about a historical pattern in which there’s an era, of upper abuse, then there’s an era of downer abuse – and this sort of conforms to that. A methamphetamine addict can only stay up so long before they start to crash and have all the negative side effects – paranoia, irritability. If you ever stayed awake on caffeine, or on energy drinks, it’s not a real comfortable place to be, and you feel it. That leads to eras spanning 10-20 to 30 years where people are facilitated by the uppers – cocaine and meth, but leads them to a crash. So then they seek something to help them come down, to get some sleep, be more relaxed and rested.

Speedballs combine both uppers and downers. In the last 5-10 years we saw an explosion of Red Bull bars, where a shot of Jagermeister or whiskey is dumped inside an energy drink like Red Bull, Monster or Rock Star, and downed to get – in effect- a speedball. Research shows that taking an upper and a downer at the same time provides a person with one of the best feelings you can ever get from drugs … heroin and cocaine taken together, or meth with Vicodan, or Ecstasy with heroin. A small slice of people go from one to the other, and discover that the combination was the best of both worlds, only to discover that they have become addicted to both.  The same energy drink companies are now coming out with these opposites. These are like an antihistamine drink, they contain some kind of valerian root, some kind of chamomile or some other natural herbs to help sedate a person or help them come off their energy rush. There’s one called Drank which was the street name for that old hip-hop drink that abused antihistamines called Purple Drank. So it’s apropos for this whole upper-downer cycle including the speedball cycle to be part of that. Now we are in transition – headed toward downers again. The street is fascinating – they figure out things way before pharmacologists or doctors or scientists.

 
icon for podpress  Standard Podcast: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Holidays – Guilt, Gambling & Java

Friday, December 11th, 2009

People with substance abuse issues often find that the Holiday Season can bring up old wounds – we look at some of the issues around guilt for the addicted person. Also news about treatment for gambling addiction, and a chat about the addictive qualities of caffeine.

Listen to podcast

Transcript (edited):

Welcome to the CNS podcast featuring Dr Darryl Inaba research director for CNS Productions.

CNS: Hi and welcome once again to the addiction podcast from CNS Productions, I’m Howard LaMere here with Dr. Darryl Inaba. Darryl, in continuing with the holiday motif, we’re talking about guilt as one of the reasons for an increase in addiction during the holidays.

Darryl: I think it’s absolutely accurate. Lynn O’Connor of Wright Institute did a study of women who seem to have more guilt and shame than men. The study looked at addicts and alcoholics entering treatment and measured guilt, shame and alpha-beta pride and found that those coming into treatment suffer tremendous amount of guilt, tremendous amount of shame about they’ve done. They have a low self esteem, low pride in themselves and are on the receiving end of a lot of anger from their families who have seen them make promise after promise only to break them all.  Recently I’ve been working with gamblers and I am finding this anger more prevalent in gambler families. During the holidays there is a lot of societal pressure to interact with friends and family – those we might have injured and hurt, so there is going to be a lot more guilt, shame, and feelings of low self esteem, which contribute to the desire to alter your state of conscientiousness. The easiest way for people with compulsive disorders to alter their states of consciousness is to partake in those activities that screen or suppress their feelings of guilt and shame for a while. This desire to feel better leads to more slips and therefore more relapses during the holiday season.

CNS: More so than the rest of the year, just because of the pressure. We’ve talked about drug relapses, we’ve talked about food. Now there’s another topic in the news – caffeine addiction. A report from the surgeon general stated that caffeine was habituating, rather than addicting. I don’t think anyone who drinks coffee would dispute the fact that it’s addicting. I mean I have to have that first cup of coffee in the morning, I try, I try having tea, green tea, which has caffeine anyway and it’s still not the same. I mean, there’s something very addictive about caffeine and so how can anyone say it’s not addictive?

Darryl: Well, it goes beyond denial, there’s certainly going to be denial in terms of any kind of addiction. When it comes to caffeine it’s almost a cultural reticence or a fear that this – the last thing left to alter our states of conciseness – is going to be taken away, or looked on negatively, and so caffeine…

CNS: More guilt…

Darryl: A lot more guilt.  Caffeine has remained under the radar for lots of reasons. It’s escaped any crucial examination. We’ve looking at nicotine and other substances like alcohol, but caffeine is probably the last thing we’ll look at with that much scrutiny. Caffeine is defiantly an addictive substance. It’s a xanthine alkaloid, it’s a stimulant, it creates similar, although at much lower levels and intensity, changes in the body as does cocaine, and nicotine and methamphetamine. It affects the same processes in the brain. Scientists have looked at caffeine for a long time and believe that anytime you drink over five hundred milligrams a day of caffeine, your brain and your brain chemistry is altered. Researches see the beginnings of compulsive or addictive tendencies.  Above eight hundred to one thousand two hundred milligrams of caffeine a day a person begins to have negative body toxic effects. I’ve always felt that caffeine maybe responsible for a lot more deaths than cocaine and heroin just from the toxic effects it can render to your heart and blood vessels. Caffeine causes distress in those areas of your physiology. As you mentioned, everybody who consumes caffeine, knows about withdrawal when they try to stop. The headache, that pressure headache in the front of your brain can last several months to a year before it finally begins to dwindle and go away. So caffeine is physically addicting, it’s certainly emotionally addicting.  I don’t know anybody who realizes that they use caffeine to get stimulated in the morning to wake up, to do their work and to get off on their day. When they take a vacation, take several weeks where they don’t have to get up and do anything – just eat and have fun, they still reach for that cup of coffee automatically, instinctively without even thinking. This is a true, true dependency and a true habituation. So caffeine is defiantly an addictive substance, defiantly something that that we’re going to have to look at in terms of how it’s affecting our health.

CNS: Like the hybridization of marijuana, the proliferation over the last 5 or 10 years of coffee shops that sell really strong coffee, from  Seattle to Silicon Valley,  we must wonder if it’s related to computers and dotcom and the generation x factor, I don’t know that that’s true but we’re definitely seeing stronger caffeine products.

Darryl: I actually had to detoxify and go into recovery for caffeine addiction some twenty-five, thirty years ago.  I found myself unable to go through the day without a cup of coffee in my hand. I had tremendous headaches each morning and they went away with that first cup of coffee. It was better than aspirin or anything else. When I realized my blood pressure was up and my heart had some unusual beats I recognized it was caused by my caffeine dependency and I stopped. Since then, I’ve been in rigid caffeine recovery – no coffee. Unfortunately, no one can totally avoid caffeine. It’s in cold products, aspirin, sodas, chocolates, candy- it’s everywhere. I deal with it in an unusual way. I make coffee for my wife. Ever since I stopped drinking coffee twenty five years ago, I get up the morning before her and make her coffee. Her tolerance increased over the years and now I have an espresso machine. She graduated from Starbucks and is into much stronger Pete’s coffee from San Francisco. There’s no end to where it’s going but you can definitely see that pattern. I’m just lucky that I don’t have a strong desire when I smell it; I have a strong desire in the morning…

CNS: …are you getting something from your nose?

Darryl: Yes, but I have to remind myself that I can’t – otherwise I won’t stop.  I’ll have that cup in my hand all day long and end up like I did before.

CNS: Another topic in the news this week is treatment for gambling. Perhaps gambling is not as much of an issue during the holidays as some of these other things we’ve talked about but for people that have an addiction of any sort it doesn’t stop for a holiday. So what’s in the news on gambling?

Darryl: Well, it’s very exciting news. I’ve always believed that it’s not the particular activity or the drug that causes a compulsivity to continue something even though it’s creating a tremendous negative impact on your life. It’s actually the ways the brain differs in certain individuals that conspires to rob them of their control and then conspires to keep them engaged in that activity even though they desperately what to stop. I don’t know if there’s a stronger addiction than gambling. I’ve worked with cocaine addicts and alcoholics and heroin addicts but working with gambling addiction I’ve concluded that it is one of the strongest addictions. Perhaps it is because our society doesn’t place a stigma on gambling. Society labels addicts “problem gamblers” and/or “pathological gamblers”. Pathological gamblers can’t stay away from the action and they bet everything. They loose their home, they loose their vehicle. More people are walking the streets to work and walking around town not because they are alcoholics who lost their license, but because they gambled away their vehicle and any money buy another one. They max out credit, get themselves in terrible debt, and start participating in illegal activities.

With the advent of brain imagining in the  1980’s, researchers found the same type of changes and the same activity in the gamblers brain as they made a bet as they saw in the cocaine addict’s brain or a meth addict’s brain taking a hit. The brain process and the pathways are the same. What I find exciting is that now medicine has recognized that similarity. Medication that was originally developed for heroin addiction and then was found to be effective in blocking craving in alcoholism is also actively helping gamblers. By giving them naltrexone, an opiate antagonist that blocks the opiate receptors from opiates, which blocks a gamblers craving. They are able to remain in recovery and are better able to avoid taking that first bet.  This has created a better understanding of what addiction is and opened an avenue for more appropriate and better treatments to help people with this condition.

CNS: It’s exciting that we are finding ways to address these issues but I’m again reminded of 1984, there’s a danger of taking drugs to deal with drugs.

Darryl: Maybe so but in another reality, as I work with addicts, I think it’s a wonderful thing that’s happening. The important thing to focus on is that addicts, especially gamblers beat themselves up wondering why they’re doing what they are doing. Now they are finally beginning to accept, through this whole medical process, that they really have an illness, that they’re not weak willed individuals, they’re not bad, stupid, crazy, or amoral. They have a biological difference that makes them unable to control these behaviors. This helps them to accept that they need treatment and they need to practice recovery better and with vigor.

CNS: Other options are the organic things that we can do. We’ve talked about singing and dancing and other organic things that make us feel good.

To those folks listening, your comments and questions are more than welcome. Stop by the web site www. cnsproductions.com, drop us an email and we’ll address your questions. Darryl, happy holidays once again.

Darryl: Stay warm, Howard, its getting cold.

CNS: Yes it is definitely winter, ok, bye-bye, that wraps our pod for today. Thanks for visiting the CNS pod cast. Please check back soon for the next in the series and visit our website www.cnsproductions.com.

 
icon for podpress  Standard Podcast: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Alcohol-caffeine drinks & e-cigarettes

Friday, August 7th, 2009

Our Addiction Radio podcast looks at the synergistic effects of combining alcohol with caffeine, as well as electronic or e-cigarettes, the attractiveness of both to younger audiences, and effects of marketing.

Transcript of podcast (click to listen):

CNS: Hi and welcome to the CNS addiction pod cast, I’m Howard LaMere,  here with Dr Darryl Inaba, and Darryl there’s a bunch of interesting things in the news this week, and I don’t know, which you might want to comment on but just a quick list just for the benefit of people listening. Alcohol and caffeine drinks is being targeted by concerned people in the government as something as maybe needs some regulation, electronic cigarettes where also in the news being something that’s a largely made in China, and the health concerns around that and especially unknown additives and um, the continuation of the story about Michael Jackson and the propofol anesthetic. The abuse of that especially by the medical and medical profession itself as well as high profile folks that afford that can afford it. Maybe the one you’re looking at there a alcohol & caffeine drinks might be of something, might be something to chat about a bit.

Darryl: Howard actually those are all phenomenal developments and are interesting things to talk about. We’ve noticed this, this growth of caffeinated alcoholic beverages along time ago not just the fact that right now they’re coming out combined together where they’re mixing um, the vodka and the bourbon and the other things right along with the a soda and the fruit drinks in the, in the can that are sodas combined project, and of course that can supposedly only goes to adults twenty one years old.

The youth are the ones and under aged drinkers are the ones who are most attracted by these types’ drinks.

But prior to that there was, there is, still a huge growth in, what they call the bomb technique, out here, the bomb, there’s actually I think many of the bars now have specialized mini bars that, that target and focus on the combination of energy drinks with a shot of some sort of liqueur or some sort of liquid. The most popular one I’ve seen is Jägermeister.

Where one club here in the local area has a special bar that specializes with a red bull drinks. With red bull in a glass and then a shot of Jägermeister mixing that together foams up when it’s mixed together drinking that down, another club here has a rockstar.  Rockstar is the one they like where they mix it with Rockstar and then another one has Monster, it depends on which popular energy drinks that people are interested in. But it’s a phenomenon that really goes back to the old concept of a speed ball where you mix both a drug of stimulatory brain activity with another drug of depressant activity in the brain and in all fairness the a, and when we looked at that in pharmacology as, what happens when you combine an upper and a downer usually the results were you get better effects than either of them alone. That the people who took or were exposed to morphine and cocaine or amphetamine and some sort of depressant drugs that, that was the best high they ever got was a combination

CNS: Yeah it doesn’t cancel each other out it doesn’t make you like normal.

Darryl: Yeah that’s the bigger myth or misunderstanding that they’re going to be an antidote for each other.

And so if you od on one you can be wakened up by the other or if you’re too over amped you can be put to sleep by the downer and they’re, they’re not true antagonist they don’t cancel out each other but what’s interesting is that they’re physic effects or the emotional effects that people get out of them when they’re combined seems to be almost additive or synergistic. Rather than canceling they actually augment each other. People really feel better when you, when you combine them so that’s one aspect about these energy drinks and caffeine being mixed with alcohol that you’re going to get a better effect, you know and people are going to get more euphoric and its going to be more habituating or more interesting or more addictive, to those people who are more inclined to addiction. The other thing that’s, that’s occurring is a dangerous pharmacology in which they work by effecting different parts of the brain and different brain chemistry. So what’s really happening when they take the combination of an upper and downer is they’re getting some parts of their brain that are being energized or being more stimulated or seemingly more alert while another part of their brain is being depressed or made sleepy so it’s sort of the equivalent of getting a wide awake, wide awake drunk, somebody who’s intoxicated, who’s reflexes are diminished, who’s perceptions are diminished and all that but emotionally they feel less sleepy or less drowsy and so that’s, that’s sets the stage for much more accidents, a lot more problems that they’ll get from, from a just drinking alone.

CNS: And probably the inclination to take more of it.

Darryl: Yeah because it’s euphoric, it’s, the combination gives you a better high too and then the inclination because it suppresses your inhibitions and things like that, you’re memory, you’re going, you’re going to use more drugs. So the person who’s a going to participate with the energy drinks with the alcohol or these new products that are combining caffeine with alcohol in a can is, is going to probably end up doing more then they norm, would normally do of either coffee or alcohol and in that way suffering a greater chance of, of problems from each of those drugs. But it is a phenomena that is really, really popular I see amongst very, very young drinkers, people who are twenty one and are just turned twenty one and are able to drink but more sadly I see it more common in the under age drinkers of people who aren’t legally able to drink but they’re getting into the drinking scene early and they seem to be really attracted to this combination speed ball of alcohol with caffeine

CNS: Yeah and probably part of, I think part of the concern here by the government by regulators is, that it is an attractive component?

Darryl: Attractive in terms of?

CNS: Yeah attractive to a younger audience and you know, I don’t know how regulation does much to that other than taking it off the market.

Darryl: It’s, it’s the same thing we looked at when we looked at nicotine, when nicotine needed to have a certain market share by increasing it’s, it’s sales by so much and they maxed out on the, the adult population, we believe we saw marketing that was focused or that was targeted to under age smokers, you know. Cartoonish types figures, Joe Camel scene was all about that, the whole allure was to a much younger population and I think the same thing is happening with these combination of buzz drinks or alcohol caffeine drinks, primarily because the whole energy drink scene is really a young scene, it’s started, it’s focused on, it’s marketed to, and if you look at the buyer, the profile of the average buyer of, of red bull or rockstar or monster they’re going to be a much, much younger population so you have that inherent population to begin with and inherent market and then when you add alcohol to that mix it just sort of exponentially adding your chances to a gain that market share.

CNS: I don’t know if its directly related but lets chat a little bit about the a electronic cigarette, it showed up on national public radio recently and what I didn’t know about it is that it’s apparently, primarily produced in China so there’s a lot of concerns about what might be in there and about, about the labeling. What do you think about the labeling, in general in both. I mean labeling is mentioned in, in this context in the energy and alcohol drinks because it I mean it says all over it that there’s alcohol in it but it doesn’t say how much caffeine there is in it and in the context of the electronic cigarettes it’s in a solution of Propylene Glycol which is not a terribly good thing to take into your body.

Darryl: Labeling certainly can play a major role in how market, in how product is marketed and how it’s viewed and when it became law that everything had to be, list it’s contents say food and people very quickly realized the marketing potential that that had and was able to promote products just by having their labeling or making sure they had a contents that were attractive to certain populations and track that population the same way you know labeling for a drugs like caffeine and nicotine has always played, I think, a major role and a very bizarre one, you would think when the government came out with each pack of nicotine had to be labeled that this is harmful to your health and everything that would be a deterrent, but it proved not to be a deterrent and in one case you had death brand cigarettes who decided to make that a positive and came out with a more appropriate warning that says, saying that this product will defiantly kill you. You know, it’s going to give you lung cancer, it’s going to mess with your heart and you’re going to die twenty two younger than the average non smoker and it certainly did not help it’s sales, it kind of boosted them because you have that kind of gangster element or the contrary element that I’m going to do this and that’s the case may be. But the whole move, this whole thing with electronic cigarettes and when I first heard about it I don’t know that much about I must admit, but when I first heard about I thought it was a form of trying to promote healthier nicotine you know, a form of, of trying to get rid of all the resins and all of the tars and all of the you know hundreds, hundreds of carcinogens and other nasty products that you get from smoking tobacco and so I thought I at least, I mean you know, at least now, the industry if it’s coming out of China, I don’t know who’s sponsoring it out of China or whatever but at least the industry is now willing to forego their old argument for hundreds of years that make claim and they actually testified before congress and had their doctors lined up and experts saying “In my opinion nicotine is not addictive”. At least now they’re foregoing this and saying hey, we’re not selling you the pleasure of, of the taste and the process of smoking, we’re selling you something you got, you’re strung out on, and we’re going to give it to you in a form that’s maybe a harm reduction form. You know we’re going to reduce the harm by giving it to you a purer form and one that’s going to be less carcinogenic although nicotine itself is carcinogenic; it’s going to be less so, without all those additives and the adulterants or whatever. So I thought that’s what was going to be and maybe it was a half way rational approach to satisfy the nicotine addicted population who weren’t going to stop smoking, using nicotine. But as it turns out what I understand of these a products that, that are these electronic cartridges that, that are filled with nicotine in the standardized form or in a gaseous form, is that they contain some of the other chemicals found in nicotine, they contain some of the other additives already there and as you mentioned there’s the potential that there could be other additives added to it. Now I imagine they have to come under FDA scrutiny in order to be sold as a product.

CNS: Apparently that’s part of why it’s in the news, apparently it’s not it, hasn’t been approved.

Darryl: Yeah, I don’t know how that works, how that, you’ve got these Indian cigarettes like Bidi and stuff like that its suppose to be made out of certain kinds of herbal, herbal plants and of a betel nut leaves and things like that that are sold for smoking but yet they aren’t, they don’t seem to come regulated so I’m not sure how our government decides what gets regulated and what doesn’t. But if they’re not regulated and if they maybe they slipped under the exemption for nicotine, nicotine early on its career gained a federal exemption that says that they don’t have to be banded. The way the government, the way our laws are, if, if a product is shown to cause cancer it’s, it’s no longer allowed for human consumption. Nicotine is the only substance I know that’s exempt from that condition because of the law being tobacco history from 1920’s and 30’s. Well maybe they’re, they’re slipping in under that, they’re saying this is nicotine and it’s, it’s allowed to be sold and they’re not saying what else is in there and what else going to be in there. But one thing that’s clear from the history nicotine in the United States, is that if you have a population, addicted populations, who are going to be attracted to a product and will be a loyal faithful population then you’re going to do everything you can to claim or keep that population using that substance. Plus you want to introduce other people so we saw all the manipulations of nicotine to make it more powerful, more addictive, at the same time they’re saying it’s not addictive. The creation of free base nicotine and who knows maybe the nicotine in these cartridges and these electronic nicotine, nicotine products is actually free base nicotine and not nicotine salts and therefore free base nicotine being much more addictive and toxic well you’re going to create a much greater degree of addiction so it, it is an interesting phenomena and probably one we need to look at but maybe if we look at it side ways or close enough it’s going to evoke a need to re-look at all of our nicotine laws and of course you know there was a recent partnership made between the tobacco industry and the government where by the FDA can now regulate the tobacco industry but, but they cant ban it that was the deal that was struck so this, this will be an interesting legal political phenomena that’s pushed up to our fore front to see where this takes us.

CNS: And as all of these topics, I’m sure we’ll get to talk about it multiple times in the future.

You’ve been listening to the CNS pod cast for this week and if you have any questions or comments we’d love to hear them. Send them along in an email and Dr Inaba will try to respond to them as possible in future broadcasts or pod casts and you can do that by visiting our web site and sending us an email from there and that website is cnsproductions.com. Darryl, thank you once again and talk to you soon.

Thanks for visiting the CNS pod cast. Please check back soon for the next in the series and visit our website www.cnsproductions.com.

 
icon for podpress  CNS Addiction Radio : Play Now | Play in Popup | Download