Archive for the ‘Uppers’ Category

New treatment for uppers, and changes in federal funding

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

No treatment medications for cocaine and meth addicts have been approved by the FDA. Now a new drug that focuses on upper drugs  – in combination with motivational counseling – is being clinically tested in San Francisco that may offer cocaine and meth users more hope for better treatment outcomes from their addiction.  Also a look at what defines a federally-qualified behavioral health center, and the hope for more treatment options. Dr Inaba comments.

 
icon for podpress  Standard Podcast: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share this Post:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MisterWong
  • StumbleUpon
  • Mixx
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Propeller
  • Live
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkedIn
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Furl
  • TwitThis
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • BarraPunto
  • blogmarks
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Pownce
  • NewsVine

MCAT, prescription drug abuse leading to heroin, and more about pot

Friday, April 9th, 2010

A look at mephedrone or MCAT -  a  synthetic verson of the eastern African khat plant – is  a strong stimulant, with reports coming from UK, where it has become very popular, of  serious overdose issues.   Prescription drugs misuse and abuse continues as an escalating problem especially among young people – and the increased possibility of addiction to opiod pain medication leading to heroin use — made more pronounced by the flooding of the market with high potency and low cost heroin coming in from Mexico and Afghanistan. Also more on the implications of legalizing marijuana.

Listen to podcast

Transcript (edited):

CNS:   Hi and welcome once again to the CNS Addiction Podcast.  I am Howard LaMere with Dr. Darryl Inaba.  Looking at the recent news of addiction, drug use and dependency, I see a lot of stories about things we’ve talked about recently, like the addicting qualities of eating, especially high fat/high flavor items like bacon, chocolate, potato chips and desserts, a big story just came out in Scientific American (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=addicted-to-fat-eating) about that.  Also the continuing story on legalizing marijuana in California where the question will be on the ballot – what will that mean to the people using it medicinally, the people growing it and the government.  If it passes in California, it’s still going against federal law. We’ll have to wait to see what happens. Let’s talk more about prescription drugs and some of the substances that are being abused and causing serious illnesses.  There are some stories about a sharp upturn in the last few years especially among adolescences in the use of pharmaceuticals and what that leads to. Kids start on the OxyContin from their parent’s drug cabinet and because it is such an expensive drug, they end up substituting heroin. The other interesting item out of the UK is this new craze going on with something called MCAT.

DARRYL:      It is mephedrome and it’s been around for awhile. It is related to khat which East Africans have chewed for generations, maybe up to 1000 years. The shrub produces leaves which must be picked fresh because the (drug substance) cathinone is destroyed by the environment within 24 hours.  So because it was found Africa and the leaves needed to be fresh – it has never been a big item here. But what happened in the United States in the early 90’s was the development of a synthetic version called “methcathinone” by putting a metho group on it, a CH3 group on the apparent compound cathinone, it became more stable in the environmental and it could be sold off as a pill or powder.

CNS:   Is it just as strong?

DARRYL:      Yes, they claim it was just as strong.  Pharmacologists say it wasn’t as strong, but what we’re seeing now in Europe is a number of deaths related to its (methcathione) use.  We don’t see many deaths associated with methamphetamine abuse, so it must be that the methcath is much stronger than even methamphetamine.  But it’s growing there (in Europe) and its potential for abuse here stems from the fact that there are no laws that prohibit methcathinone.  So, like many other new drugs, it’s finding its way on the internet and you can buy it. I’ve also heard of people in this country gaining access on the internet to fresh cut khat leaves, and have heard that the chemical properties really don’t get destroyed within 24 hours, so it can be cut and shipped and people can get high.  On a personal note – Amnesty International contacted me once and asked me to detoxify a person from Somalia who was trying to come into the United States to be with his family, but he was a known khat addict so the US wouldn’t let him in.  I said,” Sure we can detoxify him.”   We detoxify methamphetamine users so we had it all set up and I never heard from the guy.  He never showed up for treatment.  About 5 years later he gets busted for growing khat trees in Monterey!  So there might be some local crop available on the west coast. Khat is definitely an upper and mephedrome or MCAT or whatever they want to call it – synthetic cathinone – looks like it’s going to be another drug that’s is now on the DEA’s radar to classify very soon.

CNS:   I think the UK is talking about taking action immediately because it is   apparently being sold as a plant fertilizer.

DARRYL:      So is synthetic marijuana which is now causing a lot of problems and sold as incense as well.  And I remember isobutyl nitrite – Russian locker room – sold as a room deodorizer, and sometimes it is sold as shoe polish.  You know….as long as you don’t call it a food, drug or cosmetic, you don’t come in violation of any drug laws for testing or anything and you can market it for what you’re using, but what happens if it gets abused strongly?  Then the government has to look at it a different way and maybe reclassify it.

CNS:   Is there anything else we can say to expand on pharming – the off-label use of pharmaceuticals that is becoming an ever increasing phenomenon, especially amongst young people.

DARRYL:      Well we’ve been watching that develop for a long time in our area.   Over the last 3 years there have been conferences and reports and such indicating an incredible increase in the abuse of diverted prescription drugs, by adolescences They get them from the internet or by raiding their parents and grandparents medicine cabinets, and more often when young kids go to dinner with their parents to their neighbor’s or their parents friend’s home they rush into the bathrooms to see what they’ve got and take everything that’s available.  There was a recent bust I believe in Oregon, where millions of dollars worth of pharmaceuticals were stolen.  The thieves busted in like a major sophisticated theft operation, like a sting….like a diamond or art theft …they broke in from the ceiling, cutting through and lowered  themselves down with these special belts and stuff and hauled off something like 73 million dollars worth of pharmaceuticals.

More kids are taking prescription drugs and diverting prescription drugs than are abusing marijuana, cocaine, heroin and a lot of other drugs.  Actually right now, the statistics show that prescription drugs are being abused by 20% of the teen population in the United States and probably a little bit higher here in Oregon because Oregon ranks towards the top.  I have noticed that during the last 5 years or so, a 500 or 600% increase in abuse among teenagers than in the previous era.  And between 1995 and 2004, there was a 3000% increase in abuse of prescription drugs.  OxyContin, Vicodin – those are still the preferred drugs The sad part about that is that once people get addicted to opiates, their thirst and their tolerance for opiates grows exponentially.  OxyContin is expensive on the street, selling for like 50 dollars a pill.  And the heroin  glut that’s on the market from Afghanistan, Mexico, South America, Golden Triangle, Southwest Crescent, the golden crescent – all those areas have now actually decreased the price of heroin to like 5 dollars a bag. A nickel bag or a nickel paper was last heard of during the early 1960’s.  So heroin with costing 5 dollars a nickel bag and OxyContin costing 50 dollars a pill, it becomes very attractive for prescription drug abusers to turn their attentions to heroin, and once they turn their attention to heroin, the number of users who use intravenously is so much higher than with other drugs.  We are seeing another epidemic of intravenous drug abuse and intravenous heroin abuse because of the way prescription drugs are being diverted.

CNS:   And all the complications that leads to – hepatitis and potentially HIV.   I know you’re not an economist, but if we legalize marijuana, what will be the fate of all those who have illegally made so much money through the years …it’s not like these people are just going to go straight.  They’re going to find something else to sell under the radar. We’re seeing that in California, there is a lot of violence associated with small towns, small operation growers bumping up against people stealing from them, or feeling competition from the major drug smugglers.

DARRYL:      Well, the political climate has changed towards legalizing marijuana.  Not just for medical purposes, but just to legalize it overall.  I think in the 1990’s, in California, only 22% of the polled voters favored legalizing marijuana.  In the year 2006 or so, you are looking at 46% and current polls are saying that 56…or over half the voters now favor legalizing marijuana.  Not for social or health reasons but purely because of the economic factor involved.  Governor Brown…Willy Brown, San Francisco mayor, California governor…writes an op-ed column in the San Francisco Chronicle and he wrote, “truth be told, there’s just too much money to be made both by the people who grow marijuana in the cities and counties that would like to tax it, not to vote for it.”  So that whole scene has changed where even Governor Schwarzenegger is saying we need to look at this, we need to look at the potential revenue.  There is a 9 block area in Oakland, California called “Oaksterdam” and a guy – Richard Lee is making millions of dollars through several pot shops set up already where you can get weed to smoke a lot faster than you can get a cup of coffee. People like him are going to be in the forefront of financing the lobby to get marijuana legalized.  This is too lucrative a thing to pass up and what I don’t understand is why nobody is looking at the long-term costs.  You know the short term gains are going to be huge.  You know people are going to jump on the bandwagon.  They will probably tax the paraphernalia, the names, everything about it. Nicotine….caffeine, heroin, cocaine – they all generate money.  People are just going to do whatever they can to get the money necessary to continue accessing these things.  But in the long run, what about the traffic accidents?  We know marijuana can cause traffic accidents.  What about the health issues?  We know it causes airway disease.  Maybe not as much cancer as does nicotine but certainly emphysema and a lot of airway diseases that come about from it.  All of these costs are not being looked at.  The fact is….it’s the general public will be voting on this – not the experts – and the general public seems to be of the mind to make marijuana legal.  It’s a threat, I think, to recovering people.  There are people who recognize that they are addicted to marijuana and are struggling to stay clean.  If it becomes legal, it will make it a lot harder because people will be smoking it wherever, and those in recovery will smell it and perhaps make them crave it.  Marijuana is one of those psychoactive drugs that operate in the same place in the brain where fat operates and as we predicted a long time ago – does the same thing to a brain as does cocaine, heroin and other drugs. If people who are vulnerable to addiction, or are in recovery use it – it can lead them to relapse by creating a craving for the drug that they most want and prefer.

CNS:   As is often the case throughout human history, we tend to act on the basis of short-term gains and don’t consider the long-term picture.  To our listeners – if you have comments or questions, send us an email.

 
icon for podpress  Standard Podcast: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share this Post:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MisterWong
  • StumbleUpon
  • Mixx
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Propeller
  • Live
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkedIn
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Furl
  • TwitThis
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • BarraPunto
  • blogmarks
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Pownce
  • NewsVine

Coffee can be good for you – according to new studies

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

A recent story in the Wall Street Journal highlights some significant benefits to drinking coffee. Also a look at the new “anti-energy” drinks like Drank, containing calming herbs like chamomile, melatonin, valerian root and rose hip. Dr Inaba comments include the every-few-decades cycling of the kind of drugs that are popular.

Listen to podcast

Transcript (edited):

CNS:    Hi and welcome once again to the CNS Addiction Podcast. I’m Howard LaMere, here with Dr Darryl Inaba. One of the topics we focused on recently was the negative aspects of coffee and caffeine, and here is an article in the (December 31, 2009) Wall Street Journal about the positive aspects of coffee.

DARRYL: Quite a surprising story, an amazing one published by the WSJ which is fairly investigative and conservative in their reporting, and they published this just before Christmas, when people are gearing up for the Holidays  – the after-dinner coffees, and coffees during the day, so it was good timing. Contrary to many older studies which outline the negative aspects, the hazards and the addictive properties of coffee, this study showed positive results, amazing results from the practice of drinking coffee. Six cups of standard coffee lowered the risk of prostate cancer, 5 cups lowered the risk of Alzheimer’s by 65% in a Finnish study … that alone is enough to inspire me to go back to drinking coffee after I have been clean from coffee for some 30 something years.  I haven’t touched a drop of coffee because when I start I can’t seem to stop, I’ll go way above 6 cups, I’ll go up to 20 cups a day. But if 5 cups per day can lower the risk of Alzheimer’s disease by 65% that is saying something. It also cuts the possibility of stroke in women, and reduced the risk of developing Type II diabetes, which impacts a huge number of people in the United States. Close to 80 million people are pre-diabetic or diabetic type IIs so if 4 cups a day can cut that by 25 – 35 %, that’s a huge health benefit.

The study also claims coffee cuts the risk of gallstones, and lowers the risk of committing suicide. That surprised me because one of the problems with drinking coffee in excess is the crash.  According to this study, people that drink at least 2 cups of coffee a day cut the risk of suicide by 60%.  All these positive things are quite amazing. The older studies found increased hypertension – high blood pressure, cardiac or heart irritability with a propensity to develop irregular heart beat, increased stroke risk, and risk of miscarriage. A recent study says that pregnant women who drink 3 cups a day increase the risk of miscarriage. A lot of major hazards, GI irritability, maybe even some cancers of the stomach are on the opposite side of these health benefits. So the jury is still out about if it’s positively good for you, or positively bad for you, but it seems like there’s a lot of good news about coffee drinking.

CNS:    How are these studies conducted, it’s hard to do a regular double-blind test.

DARRYL: This is purely anecdotal. These are just reports – asking questions of people, and that’s why these studies are controversial. Researchers will ask people how many cups of coffee they drink a day, over how long a period of time, because they want to gage results on a longitudinal basis, to see what risks are connected. A lot of people aren’t going to remember how many cups of coffee they drank over the last ten years. And people are either stimulus-augmenters, or stimulus-reducers, I find very few people who are stimulus-normal.  And that means, some people are going to exaggerate – think they drank a higher number, and some will be stimulus-reducers; thinking they drink a lesser number per day.

CNS:    So what do make of the effect you mentioned of the stimulant effect on blood pressure – high blood pressure and heart disease – it sounds like its very contradictory. The article also mentions other substances beside caffeine in coffee, which might have a counteracting effect.

DARRYL: Caffeine is linked to increases in ergotamine, which is implicated in a number of health issues, so there is a concern, that’s these good studies are going to be outweighed by more of the untoward effects of coffee. I’ve always felt that caffeine addiction – drinking more than 5 cups a day or more than 500 mg, contributed to a number of deaths associated with GI, cardiac, blood pressure problems, and stroke in the US. It comes down to – what are you at more risk for, heart disease, diabetes or Alzheimer’s, so what’s better for you to take?

CNS:    That leads to wanting more information on a person’s individual biology, and we’re getting closer to that with different ways of assessing the DNA, we’re able to access much more than the family history. Where do you see that leading, in terms of how people make the kind of decisions you are talking about.

DARRYL:  That’s interesting because in medicine now, in pharmacy schools across the nation, in medical schools, they’re talking about genomics and genomic therapy. Today there is an easier method of looking at peoples genes, getting peoples vulnerabilities.  Gene clips take a snapshot of somebody’s gene’s vulnerabilities, to determine what type of medication is best for somebody with hypertension, with diabetes, with asthma. This matches the medication with the person’s vulnerability. If this continues to develop it will explodes into an era of medicine where everyone is treated not only by their diagnosis and symptom otology, but also by matching the treatment to their actual genetic code – what will be healthiest for them, and cause the least side effects. This could extend to nutrition, and maybe even determine whether you should drink coffee and tea or not.

CNS:  An interesting reverse side of that – Salon magazine calls 2010 the year of the “anti-energy drink.” New products have been introduced that are like the opposite of Red Bull … what do you know about that?

DARRYL:  It’s a historical thing; I see it purely in the form of history and the addiction cycle. Dr. Musto’s book (The American Disease: Origins of Narcotic Control) talks about a historical pattern in which there’s an era, of upper abuse, then there’s an era of downer abuse – and this sort of conforms to that. A methamphetamine addict can only stay up so long before they start to crash and have all the negative side effects – paranoia, irritability. If you ever stayed awake on caffeine, or on energy drinks, it’s not a real comfortable place to be, and you feel it. That leads to eras spanning 10-20 to 30 years where people are facilitated by the uppers – cocaine and meth, but leads them to a crash. So then they seek something to help them come down, to get some sleep, be more relaxed and rested.

Speedballs combine both uppers and downers. In the last 5-10 years we saw an explosion of Red Bull bars, where a shot of Jagermeister or whiskey is dumped inside an energy drink like Red Bull, Monster or Rock Star, and downed to get – in effect- a speedball. Research shows that taking an upper and a downer at the same time provides a person with one of the best feelings you can ever get from drugs … heroin and cocaine taken together, or meth with Vicodan, or Ecstasy with heroin. A small slice of people go from one to the other, and discover that the combination was the best of both worlds, only to discover that they have become addicted to both.  The same energy drink companies are now coming out with these opposites. These are like an antihistamine drink, they contain some kind of valerian root, some kind of chamomile or some other natural herbs to help sedate a person or help them come off their energy rush. There’s one called Drank which was the street name for that old hip-hop drink that abused antihistamines called Purple Drank. So it’s apropos for this whole upper-downer cycle including the speedball cycle to be part of that. Now we are in transition – headed toward downers again. The street is fascinating – they figure out things way before pharmacologists or doctors or scientists.

 
icon for podpress  Standard Podcast: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share this Post:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MisterWong
  • StumbleUpon
  • Mixx
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Propeller
  • Live
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkedIn
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Furl
  • TwitThis
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • BarraPunto
  • blogmarks
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Pownce
  • NewsVine

Holidays – Guilt, Gambling & Java

Friday, December 11th, 2009

People with substance abuse issues often find that the Holiday Season can bring up old wounds – we look at some of the issues around guilt for the addicted person. Also news about treatment for gambling addiction, and a chat about the addictive qualities of caffeine.

Listen to podcast

Transcript (edited):

Welcome to the CNS podcast featuring Dr Darryl Inaba research director for CNS Productions.

CNS: Hi and welcome once again to the addiction podcast from CNS Productions, I’m Howard LaMere here with Dr. Darryl Inaba. Darryl, in continuing with the holiday motif, we’re talking about guilt as one of the reasons for an increase in addiction during the holidays.

Darryl: I think it’s absolutely accurate. Lynn O’Connor of Wright Institute did a study of women who seem to have more guilt and shame than men. The study looked at addicts and alcoholics entering treatment and measured guilt, shame and alpha-beta pride and found that those coming into treatment suffer tremendous amount of guilt, tremendous amount of shame about they’ve done. They have a low self esteem, low pride in themselves and are on the receiving end of a lot of anger from their families who have seen them make promise after promise only to break them all.  Recently I’ve been working with gamblers and I am finding this anger more prevalent in gambler families. During the holidays there is a lot of societal pressure to interact with friends and family – those we might have injured and hurt, so there is going to be a lot more guilt, shame, and feelings of low self esteem, which contribute to the desire to alter your state of conscientiousness. The easiest way for people with compulsive disorders to alter their states of consciousness is to partake in those activities that screen or suppress their feelings of guilt and shame for a while. This desire to feel better leads to more slips and therefore more relapses during the holiday season.

CNS: More so than the rest of the year, just because of the pressure. We’ve talked about drug relapses, we’ve talked about food. Now there’s another topic in the news – caffeine addiction. A report from the surgeon general stated that caffeine was habituating, rather than addicting. I don’t think anyone who drinks coffee would dispute the fact that it’s addicting. I mean I have to have that first cup of coffee in the morning, I try, I try having tea, green tea, which has caffeine anyway and it’s still not the same. I mean, there’s something very addictive about caffeine and so how can anyone say it’s not addictive?

Darryl: Well, it goes beyond denial, there’s certainly going to be denial in terms of any kind of addiction. When it comes to caffeine it’s almost a cultural reticence or a fear that this – the last thing left to alter our states of conciseness – is going to be taken away, or looked on negatively, and so caffeine…

CNS: More guilt…

Darryl: A lot more guilt.  Caffeine has remained under the radar for lots of reasons. It’s escaped any crucial examination. We’ve looking at nicotine and other substances like alcohol, but caffeine is probably the last thing we’ll look at with that much scrutiny. Caffeine is defiantly an addictive substance. It’s a xanthine alkaloid, it’s a stimulant, it creates similar, although at much lower levels and intensity, changes in the body as does cocaine, and nicotine and methamphetamine. It affects the same processes in the brain. Scientists have looked at caffeine for a long time and believe that anytime you drink over five hundred milligrams a day of caffeine, your brain and your brain chemistry is altered. Researches see the beginnings of compulsive or addictive tendencies.  Above eight hundred to one thousand two hundred milligrams of caffeine a day a person begins to have negative body toxic effects. I’ve always felt that caffeine maybe responsible for a lot more deaths than cocaine and heroin just from the toxic effects it can render to your heart and blood vessels. Caffeine causes distress in those areas of your physiology. As you mentioned, everybody who consumes caffeine, knows about withdrawal when they try to stop. The headache, that pressure headache in the front of your brain can last several months to a year before it finally begins to dwindle and go away. So caffeine is physically addicting, it’s certainly emotionally addicting.  I don’t know anybody who realizes that they use caffeine to get stimulated in the morning to wake up, to do their work and to get off on their day. When they take a vacation, take several weeks where they don’t have to get up and do anything – just eat and have fun, they still reach for that cup of coffee automatically, instinctively without even thinking. This is a true, true dependency and a true habituation. So caffeine is defiantly an addictive substance, defiantly something that that we’re going to have to look at in terms of how it’s affecting our health.

CNS: Like the hybridization of marijuana, the proliferation over the last 5 or 10 years of coffee shops that sell really strong coffee, from  Seattle to Silicon Valley,  we must wonder if it’s related to computers and dotcom and the generation x factor, I don’t know that that’s true but we’re definitely seeing stronger caffeine products.

Darryl: I actually had to detoxify and go into recovery for caffeine addiction some twenty-five, thirty years ago.  I found myself unable to go through the day without a cup of coffee in my hand. I had tremendous headaches each morning and they went away with that first cup of coffee. It was better than aspirin or anything else. When I realized my blood pressure was up and my heart had some unusual beats I recognized it was caused by my caffeine dependency and I stopped. Since then, I’ve been in rigid caffeine recovery – no coffee. Unfortunately, no one can totally avoid caffeine. It’s in cold products, aspirin, sodas, chocolates, candy- it’s everywhere. I deal with it in an unusual way. I make coffee for my wife. Ever since I stopped drinking coffee twenty five years ago, I get up the morning before her and make her coffee. Her tolerance increased over the years and now I have an espresso machine. She graduated from Starbucks and is into much stronger Pete’s coffee from San Francisco. There’s no end to where it’s going but you can definitely see that pattern. I’m just lucky that I don’t have a strong desire when I smell it; I have a strong desire in the morning…

CNS: …are you getting something from your nose?

Darryl: Yes, but I have to remind myself that I can’t – otherwise I won’t stop.  I’ll have that cup in my hand all day long and end up like I did before.

CNS: Another topic in the news this week is treatment for gambling. Perhaps gambling is not as much of an issue during the holidays as some of these other things we’ve talked about but for people that have an addiction of any sort it doesn’t stop for a holiday. So what’s in the news on gambling?

Darryl: Well, it’s very exciting news. I’ve always believed that it’s not the particular activity or the drug that causes a compulsivity to continue something even though it’s creating a tremendous negative impact on your life. It’s actually the ways the brain differs in certain individuals that conspires to rob them of their control and then conspires to keep them engaged in that activity even though they desperately what to stop. I don’t know if there’s a stronger addiction than gambling. I’ve worked with cocaine addicts and alcoholics and heroin addicts but working with gambling addiction I’ve concluded that it is one of the strongest addictions. Perhaps it is because our society doesn’t place a stigma on gambling. Society labels addicts “problem gamblers” and/or “pathological gamblers”. Pathological gamblers can’t stay away from the action and they bet everything. They loose their home, they loose their vehicle. More people are walking the streets to work and walking around town not because they are alcoholics who lost their license, but because they gambled away their vehicle and any money buy another one. They max out credit, get themselves in terrible debt, and start participating in illegal activities.

With the advent of brain imagining in the  1980’s, researchers found the same type of changes and the same activity in the gamblers brain as they made a bet as they saw in the cocaine addict’s brain or a meth addict’s brain taking a hit. The brain process and the pathways are the same. What I find exciting is that now medicine has recognized that similarity. Medication that was originally developed for heroin addiction and then was found to be effective in blocking craving in alcoholism is also actively helping gamblers. By giving them naltrexone, an opiate antagonist that blocks the opiate receptors from opiates, which blocks a gamblers craving. They are able to remain in recovery and are better able to avoid taking that first bet.  This has created a better understanding of what addiction is and opened an avenue for more appropriate and better treatments to help people with this condition.

CNS: It’s exciting that we are finding ways to address these issues but I’m again reminded of 1984, there’s a danger of taking drugs to deal with drugs.

Darryl: Maybe so but in another reality, as I work with addicts, I think it’s a wonderful thing that’s happening. The important thing to focus on is that addicts, especially gamblers beat themselves up wondering why they’re doing what they are doing. Now they are finally beginning to accept, through this whole medical process, that they really have an illness, that they’re not weak willed individuals, they’re not bad, stupid, crazy, or amoral. They have a biological difference that makes them unable to control these behaviors. This helps them to accept that they need treatment and they need to practice recovery better and with vigor.

CNS: Other options are the organic things that we can do. We’ve talked about singing and dancing and other organic things that make us feel good.

To those folks listening, your comments and questions are more than welcome. Stop by the web site www. cnsproductions.com, drop us an email and we’ll address your questions. Darryl, happy holidays once again.

Darryl: Stay warm, Howard, its getting cold.

CNS: Yes it is definitely winter, ok, bye-bye, that wraps our pod for today. Thanks for visiting the CNS pod cast. Please check back soon for the next in the series and visit our website www.cnsproductions.com.

 
icon for podpress  Standard Podcast: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Share this Post:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MisterWong
  • StumbleUpon
  • Mixx
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Propeller
  • Live
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkedIn
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Furl
  • TwitThis
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • BarraPunto
  • blogmarks
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Pownce
  • NewsVine